Canada's Productivity Crisis and Your XEQT Portfolio: Why Global Diversification Matters More Than Ever
I had a conversation with my dad a few months ago that stuck with me. He is a retired engineer, the kind of guy who reads the Financial Post every morning with his coffee. He looked up from his tablet and said, “You know, when I started working in the eighties, a Canadian engineer made roughly the same as an American one. Now the gap is embarrassing.”
He was not exaggerating. I went home that night and looked up the numbers, and what I found honestly shook me. Canada’s GDP per capita – the simplest measure of how productive and wealthy a country is on a per-person basis – has been falling behind the United States for over two decades. Not by a little. By a lot. And the gap is accelerating.
As someone who writes about XEQT and recommends it constantly, this was actually a reassuring discovery. Not because I enjoy bad news about my own country – I love Canada – but because it confirmed something I already believed: betting your entire financial future on a single country, even your home country, is one of the riskiest things an investor can do.
This post is about Canada’s productivity crisis, what it means for your money, and why XEQT’s built-in global diversification is more important now than it has ever been.
1. What Is the Productivity Crisis, and Why Should You Care?
Let me start with the basics, because “productivity crisis” sounds like something an economist mumbles at a conference while everyone checks their phones. But this one matters – a lot – because it directly affects your paycheque, your home value, your retirement, and your investment returns.
Productivity, in economics, means how much economic output a country generates per hour of work. When productivity goes up, wages tend to go up, businesses grow, tax revenues increase, and the overall standard of living improves. When productivity stagnates or declines, the opposite happens.
Here is the uncomfortable truth about Canada: our productivity growth has been essentially flat for the better part of a decade, and it has been falling further behind the United States and other developed nations every single year.
The Numbers Tell a Stark Story
- Canada’s GDP per capita (adjusted for purchasing power) was roughly 85% of US levels in 2000. By 2025, it had fallen to approximately 72-74%. That is a massive decline in relative living standards.
- Business investment per worker in Canada has been declining in real terms since around 2015, while it has been surging in the US – particularly in technology and intellectual property.
- Labour productivity growth in Canada has averaged roughly 1% per year over the past decade, compared to about 1.5-2% in the United States. That gap compounds dramatically over time.
- The OECD has specifically called out Canada as having one of the weakest productivity performances among advanced economies.
Why does this matter for investors? Because stock market returns are ultimately driven by corporate earnings, and corporate earnings are driven by economic growth and productivity. A country that produces less per person, invests less in innovation, and falls behind its peers in competitiveness is not a country whose stock market you want to be exclusively invested in.
2. Why Canada’s Economy Has a Structural Problem
Before we get to the investing implications, it is worth understanding why Canada’s productivity has stalled. This is not a temporary blip caused by one bad policy or one unlucky year. These are deep, structural issues that have been building for decades.
Over-Reliance on Real Estate
I love Canada, but we have built an economy that revolves around buying and selling houses to each other at ever-increasing prices. That is a slight exaggeration, but not by much.
Real estate and related industries account for a disproportionate share of Canada’s GDP – roughly 13-15% when you include construction, real estate services, and financial activities linked to housing. Compare that to about 6-7% in the United States.
The problem is that building and flipping houses does not make a country more productive. It does not create exportable products. It does not generate intellectual property. It does not scale globally. It just moves money around domestically while inflating asset prices.
When a disproportionate amount of capital, talent, and entrepreneurial energy flows into real estate instead of technology, manufacturing, or innovation, the long-term economic consequences are severe. And we are now living through those consequences.
Business Investment That Lags the Developed World
This is the chart that should terrify every Canadian investor who holds only Canadian stocks. Business investment in machinery, equipment, and intellectual property per worker has been declining in Canada while it has been rising in virtually every other developed nation.
| Country | Business Investment per Worker (Indexed, 2015 = 100) | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| United States | ~130 | Rising strongly |
| Germany | ~115 | Rising steadily |
| United Kingdom | ~110 | Rising moderately |
| Australia | ~108 | Rising moderately |
| Japan | ~112 | Rising steadily |
| Canada | ~92 | Declining |
Canada is the only G7 country where business investment per worker has actually fallen. Companies are not investing in the tools, technology, and equipment that make workers more productive. And when workers are not more productive, wages stagnate and the economy grows more slowly.
The Brain Drain Is Real
Here is an anecdote that hits close to home. Three of my closest friends from university – all engineering graduates – now live in the United States. Two are in tech in Seattle and San Francisco, and one is in finance in New York. The reason is simple: they were offered salaries that were 40-60% higher than anything available in Canada, even after accounting for the cost of living.
This is not a few isolated cases. Canada has been losing skilled workers to the US and other countries at an accelerating rate, particularly in technology, healthcare, and finance. When your brightest people leave for higher-paying opportunities elsewhere, the long-term productivity impact is devastating.
Meanwhile, Canada’s immigration policy – while bringing in record numbers of newcomers – has faced criticism for focusing too heavily on volume rather than filling specific skills gaps. High immigration combined with insufficient housing construction and business investment has put pressure on per-capita GDP without proportionally boosting productivity.
An Underdeveloped Technology Sector
The United States has Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia, and dozens of other tech giants. Canada has… Shopify. And a handful of smaller players.
Technology and innovation are the primary drivers of productivity growth in the modern economy. Countries that develop and deploy technology grow faster, pay higher wages, and generate better stock market returns. Canada’s technology sector, while growing, remains a tiny fraction of the overall economy compared to the US.
The TSX is dominated by financials (~32%), energy (~17%), and materials (~11%). Technology represents only about 8-10% of the Canadian index, compared to roughly 30% of the S&P 500. This is not just a sector weighting issue – it reflects the fundamental structure of the Canadian economy.
Don't Bet Everything on One Economy
Start building a globally diversified portfolio with XEQT on Wealthsimple. Open an account and get $25 to invest.
Get Your $25 Bonus3. What This Means for Canada-Only Investors
Now let’s connect this to your portfolio. If you hold only Canadian stocks – whether it is the Big Five banks, a TSX index fund like XIU, or a handful of Canadian dividend aristocrats – you are making a concentrated bet on an economy with serious structural headwinds.
This is the home-country bias problem that we have written about before, but the productivity crisis makes it even more urgent.
Canada Is Only 3% of the Global Stock Market
I know I say this a lot, but it bears repeating: Canada represents approximately 3% of global stock market capitalization. That means 97% of the world’s investable opportunities are outside our borders.
When Canadian investors put 50-70% of their portfolio in Canadian stocks (which research shows is common), they are making a massive overweight bet – roughly 15 to 20 times the market-cap weight – on a single country with declining relative productivity.
The Performance Gap Is Already Showing
Let’s look at actual returns. The following table compares the performance of a Canada-only portfolio, a US-only portfolio, and a globally diversified portfolio over various periods:
| Time Period | TSX Composite (Canada Only) | S&P 500 (US Only) | Global Diversified (XEQT-like) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Year (2025) | ~8% | ~14% | ~12% |
| 3 Years (2023-2025) | ~7% annualized | ~12% annualized | ~10% annualized |
| 5 Years (2021-2025) | ~6% annualized | ~13% annualized | ~10% annualized |
| 10 Years (2016-2025) | ~7% annualized | ~12% annualized | ~10% annualized |
| 20 Years (2006-2025) | ~6% annualized | ~10% annualized | ~8% annualized |
Note: All returns are approximate, in CAD, and include dividends. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
A few things jump out:
- The TSX has underperformed in virtually every time period. Not by catastrophic margins, but consistently enough to make a major difference over an investing lifetime.
- The S&P 500 has been the top performer, largely driven by the US technology boom that Canada mostly missed.
- A globally diversified portfolio (like XEQT) sits in between, giving you strong exposure to US growth while also spreading risk across international and emerging markets.
Over 20 years, the difference between 6% and 10% annualized returns on a $500/month investment is staggering:
- At 6%: ~$228,000
- At 8%: ~$290,000
- At 10%: ~$375,000
That is a $147,000 difference. Just from diversifying beyond Canada.
4. How XEQT Protects You from the Productivity Crisis
Here is where XEQT earns its keep. When you buy a share of XEQT, you are not betting on Canada. You are not betting on the US. You are betting on the entire global economy. And that distinction is critical when one country in your portfolio is struggling with structural challenges.
XEQT’s Allocation Breakdown
| Region | Approximate Allocation | What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| United States | ~45% | The world’s largest and most innovative economy. Home to the dominant tech sector. |
| Canada | ~25% | Your home market. Still meaningful exposure, but not a concentrated bet. |
| International Developed | ~20% | Europe, Japan, Australia, UK. Diversified across dozens of economies. |
| Emerging Markets | ~10% | China, India, Taiwan, Brazil. High-growth economies of the future. |
Only about 25% of your money is exposed to Canada’s productivity challenges. The other 75% is invested in economies that are growing faster, investing more in technology, and generating stronger corporate earnings.
The Automatic Hedge
Here is something that most people do not appreciate about XEQT: it automatically adjusts your exposure based on global market capitalization. If Canada’s stock market shrinks relative to the rest of the world (which is exactly what happens when productivity declines), XEQT’s Canadian allocation naturally decreases.
You do not have to monitor Canada’s economic data, make judgment calls about when to reduce your Canadian holdings, or try to time the rotation. XEQT does it for you, automatically, through the normal rebalancing process.
This is the beauty of a market-cap-weighted global ETF. The winners get a bigger share and the underperformers get a smaller share, without you lifting a finger.
And here is a bonus that we have covered in detail before: when Canada’s economy struggles, the Canadian dollar tends to weaken. Since XEQT is unhedged, that weak dollar actually boosts the Canadian-dollar value of your foreign holdings. Your 75% international allocation gets a currency tailwind exactly when the Canadian economy needs it most.
5. “But Canada Has Been Fine So Far” – The Counter-Argument
I hear this one all the time, usually from someone who has held Canadian bank stocks for 20 years and done reasonably well. And they are not entirely wrong – Canada has been fine, in the sense that it has not collapsed, the banks have not failed, and dividend cheques keep arriving.
But “fine” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.
Fine Compared to What?
- Canada’s GDP per capita has gone from roughly matching countries like the Netherlands and Germany to falling behind them.
- Canadian wages have stagnated in real terms for many workers, while US wages (especially in tech and skilled trades) have grown substantially.
- The TSX has delivered decent absolute returns, but it has meaningfully underperformed a globally diversified portfolio over most long time periods.
- Canadian housing, which propped up household wealth for decades, has shown cracks. Prices in many markets have declined from their peaks, and affordability remains at crisis levels.
“Fine” is a low bar. The question is not whether Canada will collapse – it will not. The question is whether you want to bet your entire retirement on a country that is growing more slowly than its peers. You do not need Canada to fail for a Canada-only portfolio to underperform. You just need it to grow more slowly than the rest of the world. And that is exactly what has been happening.
The Japan Cautionary Tale
There is a historical parallel that every Canadian investor should know about. In 1989, Japan was the world’s second-largest economy, its stock market was the most valuable on Earth, and Japanese real estate prices were legendarily expensive. Sound familiar?
The Nikkei 225 peaked in December 1989 at nearly 39,000. It did not return to that level until 2024 – thirty-five years later. A Japanese investor who put 100% of their portfolio in Japanese stocks in 1989 had to wait an entire generation just to break even.
I am not saying Canada is Japan. The situations are different in many ways. But the lesson is universal: no single country is immune to prolonged underperformance, and the ones that look safest and most familiar are often the most dangerous to concentrate in.
6. Even Canada’s Biggest Investors Look Beyond Canada
If you are still not convinced that global diversification matters, consider this: the people who manage Canada’s own retirement money agree with me.
The CPP Investment Board
The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) manages over $600 billion in assets on behalf of Canadian retirees. These are some of the most sophisticated institutional investors in the world. And here is where they invest:
- Approximately 85% of CPPIB assets are invested outside Canada
- Only about 15% is allocated to Canadian assets
- They invest globally across equities, real estate, infrastructure, and private equity in dozens of countries
Think about that for a moment. The fund that is literally responsible for Canadian retirement security invests 85% of its money outside of Canada. If the smartest institutional investors in the country believe that concentrating in Canada is too risky, why would individual retail investors do the opposite?
Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan
Same story. The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan – one of the largest pension funds in the world – invests roughly 80% of its assets outside Canada. They own toll roads in Australia, data centres in the US, apartment buildings in Europe, and infrastructure projects across Asia.
These institutions have teams of PhD economists and quantitative analysts. They have access to every piece of data imaginable. And their conclusion is clear: Canada alone is not enough.
XEQT effectively gives you a similar global diversification strategy – not identical to what the pension funds do, but the same underlying philosophy. Own the whole world. Do not concentrate in one country, even if it is your own.
Invest Like Canada's Smartest Pension Funds
XEQT gives you global diversification across 49 countries in a single ETF. Buy it commission-free on Wealthsimple and get a $25 bonus.
Get Your $25 Bonus7. This Is NOT About Being Negative on Canada
I want to be very clear about something, because I know how this post might come across: I am not rooting against Canada. I live here. I raise my kids here. I pay taxes here. I want this country to succeed.
But wanting Canada to succeed and betting my entire financial future on it are two very different things.
Patriotism and Portfolio Management Are Not the Same Thing
You can love Canada and still acknowledge that its economy faces real challenges. You can cheer for Canadian companies and still recognize that putting all your money in the TSX is a concentration risk. You can be proud of being Canadian and still invest globally.
In fact, I would argue that investing globally is the more responsible thing to do. By building a portfolio that does not depend on any single country’s success, you are protecting your family’s financial security regardless of what happens in the Canadian economy. That is not unpatriotic – it is prudent.
The Analogy I Always Use
Imagine you work at Shopify. You love the company, believe in its mission, and think it has a bright future. Would you put 100% of your retirement savings in Shopify stock?
Of course not. Every financial advisor in the country would tell you that is insane. Your job already depends on Shopify – your paycheque, your benefits, your career. Adding all your investments on top of that creates catastrophic concentration risk.
Investing only in Canada is the same logic, just one level up. Your job is probably in Canada. Your house is in Canada. Your CPP is tied to Canada. Your healthcare depends on Canada. If the Canadian economy struggles, your employment, your real estate, and your government benefits are all affected simultaneously. Why would you also make your entire investment portfolio dependent on the same economy?
XEQT is the answer to that question. It keeps you invested in Canada (about 25%), but it also gives you exposure to the 97% of the world’s economy that is not Canada. If Canada thrives, great – your Canadian allocation benefits. If Canada struggles, the rest of your portfolio picks up the slack.
8. The Sectors Canada Is Missing (And XEQT Gives You)
One of the most concrete ways the productivity crisis shows up in your portfolio is through sector exposure. The Canadian stock market is essentially a financials-and-resources play, and that matters enormously.
TSX vs. XEQT Sector Exposure
| Sector | TSX Weight | XEQT Weight | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | ~32% | ~16% | Canada is 2x overweight |
| Energy | ~17% | ~5% | Canada is 3x overweight |
| Materials | ~11% | ~4% | Canada is 3x overweight |
| Technology | ~9% | ~25% | Canada massively underweight |
| Healthcare | ~1% | ~11% | Canada almost nonexistent |
| Consumer Discretionary | ~4% | ~11% | Canada underweight |
| Industrials | ~13% | ~10% | Roughly comparable |
| Communication Services | ~5% | ~7% | Slightly underweight |
| Other | ~8% | ~11% | Various |
Do you see the problem? If you hold only the TSX, you have almost no exposure to technology and healthcare – the two sectors that have driven the majority of global stock market returns over the past decade and are likely to drive returns for decades to come.
With XEQT, you own Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, UnitedHealth, Johnson & Johnson, and thousands of other companies that simply do not exist in the Canadian market. These are the companies that are solving the world’s biggest problems, generating massive cash flows, and driving productivity gains globally. Through XEQT, they are working for you.
9. What Should You Actually Do About This?
Enough with the doom and gloom about Canada’s productivity – let’s talk about action. Here is what I would recommend based on everything we have covered:
If You Already Hold XEQT
You are already doing the right thing. Seriously. The fact that you hold XEQT means you have approximately 75% of your portfolio invested outside of Canada. You are already protected against Canada-specific economic weakness. Keep doing what you are doing:
- Continue your regular contributions – dollar-cost averaging into XEQT is one of the most powerful wealth-building strategies available to Canadian investors
- Do not try to time Canadian economic cycles – XEQT’s global diversification handles that for you
- Reinvest your dividends – either through DRIP or manual reinvestment
- Check your portfolio less often – the productivity crisis is a slow-moving trend, not a reason to panic
If You Currently Hold Only Canadian Stocks
This is your wake-up call. I am not saying sell everything tomorrow, but I am saying that a Canada-only portfolio carries significantly more risk than most people realize. Consider:
- Start adding XEQT to your portfolio alongside your existing Canadian holdings
- Gradually shift your allocation toward a more globally diversified mix
- Use new contributions to buy XEQT rather than adding to your Canadian positions
- Consider the tax implications – in a TFSA or RRSP, you can sell and reallocate without triggering capital gains. In a taxable account, be more strategic.
If You Are Just Starting Out
Buy XEQT and do not look back. You have the enormous advantage of starting with a clean slate. There is no reason to build a Canada-concentrated portfolio when a single ETF gives you the entire world.
Set up automatic purchases on Wealthsimple, contribute what you can every month, and let global diversification do the heavy lifting. Your future self will thank you.
Start Your Globally Diversified Portfolio Today
Open a Wealthsimple account, buy XEQT commission-free, and get a $25 bonus to kickstart your investing journey.
Get Your $25 Bonus10. The Bottom Line: Love Canada, Diversify Your Portfolio
Canada’s productivity crisis is real. GDP per capita is declining relative to our peers. Business investment is falling. The brain drain is accelerating. Our stock market remains heavily concentrated in financials and resources while the rest of the world is being transformed by technology.
None of this means Canada is doomed. Countries address structural challenges all the time, and there are plenty of reasons to be cautiously optimistic about Canada’s future. But hope is not an investment strategy.
The beauty of XEQT is that it does not require you to have an opinion on Canada’s economic future. If Canada figures out its productivity problem and the TSX roars back, your 25% Canadian allocation will benefit. If Canada continues to lag and the growth happens in the US, Europe, or emerging markets, the other 75% of your portfolio captures that growth.
You do not need to predict the future. You just need to own all of it.
That is what XEQT gives you. That is why I hold it. And with Canada’s productivity challenges making the case for global diversification stronger than ever, that is why I think every Canadian investor should seriously consider it.
Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The author holds XEQT. Returns cited are approximate and based on publicly available data. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research or consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.