The question I get asked more than any other is some variation of: “Can I just buy XEQT and nothing else?”

It shows up in Reddit threads, in my DMs, and in almost every conversation I have with a new investor. And I get it. After spending hours researching ETFs, asset allocation, and portfolio construction, you want someone to tell you the simple truth.

So here it is: for most Canadian investors, XEQT alone is a perfectly complete portfolio.

But “most” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence. Whether XEQT is truly all you need depends on your time horizon, your account type, and how close you are to actually needing the money.

In this guide, I’ll lay out the full case for and against a one-fund portfolio, so you can make a confident decision instead of second-guessing yourself every time you open your brokerage app.

If you’re still getting familiar with the fund itself, start with my breakdown of what XEQT actually is and come back here when you’re ready.


What You Actually Get with XEQT Alone

Before we talk about whether one fund is “enough,” let’s be clear about what you own when you buy a single share of XEQT. This is not some narrow bet on one market or one sector. It’s a fund of funds managed by BlackRock’s iShares, and it holds four underlying ETFs that together give you:

Here’s how the allocation breaks down:

| Region | Approximate Weight | What It Covers | |---|---|---| | United States | ~47% | S&P 500, mid-caps, small-caps | | Canada | ~24% | TSX large-caps (banks, energy, telecoms) | | International Developed | ~24% | Europe, Japan, Australia, UK | | Emerging Markets | ~5% | China, India, Taiwan, Brazil |

That is an extraordinary amount of diversification for one purchase. When people say XEQT is a “complete portfolio,” they mean it literally. You own a slice of virtually every publicly traded company on the planet.

For a closer look at exactly what’s inside, I wrote a detailed breakdown of XEQT’s holdings and what you actually own.


5 Scenarios Where XEQT Alone Is Absolutely Enough

Not everyone’s situation is the same, but there are clear profiles where a one-fund XEQT portfolio is not just acceptable – it’s optimal. If you see yourself in any of the following scenarios, you can stop overthinking.

### 1. You Have a Long Time Horizon (10+ Years) If you don't need this money for at least a decade, you have the most valuable asset in investing: time. Over 10, 20, or 30 years, global equities have historically delivered strong returns. Short-term volatility -- including drops of 30% or more -- gets smoothed out over long periods. With a 10+ year runway, adding bonds to "reduce volatility" actually just reduces your expected returns. You can afford to ride out every dip, correction, and crash because you won't be selling anytime soon. **Bottom line:** Time horizon is the single biggest factor. If yours is long, XEQT alone works.
### 2. You're Still in the Accumulation Phase If you're actively saving and investing -- adding money every month or every paycheque -- you're in what financial planners call the "accumulation phase." This is the period where you're building wealth, not drawing it down. During accumulation, market drops are actually a gift. They let you buy more shares at lower prices. You don't need the cushion of bonds because you're not withdrawing. Every dollar you invest in XEQT goes straight into global equities where it has the highest long-term growth potential. **Bottom line:** If you're still adding money regularly, keep it simple and let compounding do its work.
### 3. You Want Maximum Simplicity There's a real, measurable cost to complexity. Every additional ETF you hold is another position to track, another allocation to rebalance, another decision point where you might second-guess yourself. Research from Vanguard and others consistently shows that investors who tinker with their portfolios underperform those who set a plan and stick with it. A one-fund portfolio removes the temptation entirely. There's nothing to rebalance. Nothing to compare. You buy XEQT, you hold XEQT, you add to XEQT. That's the whole strategy. For more on why simple beats complicated, check out my guide to [lazy portfolios built with one ETF](/lazy-portfolios-one-etf/). **Bottom line:** Simplicity isn't a compromise. For many people, it's an edge.
### 4. You Don't Need Fixed Income Right Now Bonds serve a specific purpose: they reduce volatility and provide stability when you're close to needing your money. But if you're decades away from retirement, bonds drag down your returns without giving you a benefit you actually need. XEQT is 100% equities by design. That's a feature, not a bug -- for investors who can handle the ride. If watching your portfolio drop 20-30% during a bad year wouldn't cause you to panic-sell, you don't need bonds yet. I wrote a full comparison of [XEQT vs bond ETFs](/posts/xeqt-vs-bond-etfs-do-you-need-bonds/) if you want to dig deeper into when bonds actually make sense. **Bottom line:** If you won't panic-sell during a downturn, you don't need bonds, and you don't need anything beyond XEQT.
### 5. You're Investing in a TFSA or RRSP Both the TFSA and RRSP are tax-sheltered accounts, meaning you don't pay capital gains tax or tax on dividends while your money is inside them. This eliminates one of the few reasons you might want to split your portfolio into multiple funds (tax-loss harvesting and asset location strategies). Inside a TFSA or RRSP, there's no tax advantage to holding bonds separately from equities. XEQT in a single registered account is clean, simple, and tax-efficient. For the full breakdown on which account to prioritize, read my guide on [XEQT in your TFSA vs RRSP](/posts/xeqt-tfsa-vs-rrsp-where-should-you-hold-it/). **Bottom line:** Registered accounts remove the main tax-driven reasons for portfolio complexity. XEQT alone works great here.

Start Your One-Fund Portfolio Today

Buy XEQT commission-free on Wealthsimple and get $25 when you fund your account. One ETF, one account, done.

Get Your $25 Bonus

5 Scenarios Where You Might Want Something Alongside XEQT

I genuinely believe XEQT is enough for the majority of Canadian investors. But I also believe in being honest about the situations where adding one more piece makes sense. Here are the five most common.

### 1. You're Within 5 Years of Retirement This is the big one. If you're planning to start withdrawing money within the next five years, a 100% equity portfolio introduces what's called "sequence of returns risk." A major market crash right before or right after you retire can permanently damage your portfolio's ability to sustain withdrawals. Adding a bond ETF like ZAG or switching to XGRO (which includes 20% bonds) gives you a buffer. You're essentially creating a few years of stable assets you can draw from while waiting for equities to recover. **What to do:** Consider moving to an 80/20 or 70/30 equity-to-bond split as you approach retirement. My guide to building a [two-ETF portfolio with XEQT and bonds](/two-etf-portfolio-xeqt-bonds/) walks through exactly how to do this.
### 2. You Have a Very Large Non-Registered Portfolio Once your TFSA and RRSP are maxed out and you're investing in a non-registered (taxable) account, tax efficiency starts to matter more. In a taxable account, you might benefit from: - Holding Canadian equities directly (for the dividend tax credit) - Using US-listed ETFs for US equity exposure (to reduce foreign withholding taxes) - Strategically placing different asset classes in different account types For portfolios under $500,000, the tax savings from this kind of optimization are usually small enough that the simplicity of XEQT still wins. But if you have a very large taxable portfolio, it may be worth consulting a fee-only financial planner about asset location strategies. **What to do:** If your non-registered portfolio is substantial, look into whether asset location across accounts could save you meaningful tax dollars. For most people, though, XEQT in a taxable account is still perfectly reasonable.
### 3. You Have Specific Short-Term Savings Goals XEQT is not the right place for money you need within the next 1-3 years. Planning a down payment? Saving for a wedding? Building an emergency fund? That money should not be in a 100% equity fund that could drop 30% right before you need it. For short-term goals, consider: - **GICs** for guaranteed returns on a fixed timeline - **High-interest savings accounts** (or HISA ETFs like CASH.TO) for money you need to keep liquid - **Money market ETFs** for slightly higher yields with daily access **What to do:** Keep XEQT for your long-term wealth-building, but use separate, stable vehicles for money you need soon. Don't mix the two.
### 4. You Want a Small Allocation to a Specific Sector or Theme Some investors like to have a "satellite" holding alongside their core XEQT position. Maybe you want extra exposure to Canadian dividends, real estate, or a specific sector you believe in. This is fine -- with guardrails. The classic approach is a "core and satellite" strategy: - **90-95% XEQT** as your core holding - **5-10% in one or two satellite ETFs** for targeted exposure The key is keeping the satellite portion small. If your "satellite" starts looking like 30-40% of your portfolio, you've defeated the purpose of owning XEQT in the first place. **What to do:** If you want to explore this, my guide to the [best ETFs to pair with XEQT](/best-etfs-to-pair-with-xeqt/) covers the top options and how to size them appropriately.
### 5. You're Investing for a Child's Education (RESP) RESPs have a built-in deadline: your child will need the money at roughly age 18. That means the time horizon shrinks every year, and your asset allocation should shift accordingly. - **Ages 0-10:** XEQT alone is great. You have 8-18 years of runway. - **Ages 11-14:** Consider starting to add bonds (XEQT + ZAG, or switching some to XGRO or XBAL). - **Ages 15-17:** Move increasingly toward stable assets. You don't want a market crash the year before tuition is due. **What to do:** Start with XEQT and gradually de-risk as your child approaches university age. The RESP is one of the few situations where a time-based glide path genuinely matters for most investors.

One-Fund vs Two-Fund vs Multi-Fund: How Do They Compare?

Here’s a straightforward comparison of the three most common approaches Canadian investors take.

| Factor | One-Fund (XEQT Only) | Two-Fund (XEQT + Bonds) | Multi-Fund (3+ ETFs) | |---|---|---|---| | **Simplicity** | Maximum -- nothing to rebalance | Simple -- one rebalance per year | Moderate to complex | | **Cost (MER)** | 0.20% | 0.15-0.20% blended | Varies, can be lower | | **Diversification** | 12,000+ stocks, 49 countries | Same equities + bond market | Depends on selection | | **Rebalancing** | Automatic (inside XEQT) | Manual between XEQT and bonds | Manual across all holdings | | **Volatility** | Higher (100% equities) | Lower (bonds cushion drops) | Depends on allocation | | **Expected Long-Term Return** | Highest | Slightly lower | Depends on allocation | | **Best For** | Long-horizon accumulators | Near-retirees, risk-averse | Large portfolios, tax optimization | | **Behavioral Risk** | Lowest -- no decisions to make | Low -- one decision per year | Higher -- more chances to tinker | | **Time Required** | Minutes per year | 1-2 hours per year | Several hours per year |

The takeaway from this table should be clear: for the vast majority of investors, the one-fund approach wins on every dimension that matters. You give up a small amount of volatility control in exchange for a massive reduction in complexity, decision fatigue, and behavioral risk.

The two-fund approach is a sensible upgrade when you’re within 5-10 years of needing the money. And the multi-fund approach only starts making sense for very large portfolios where tax optimization justifies the added work.


The Simplicity Premium: Why Fewer Holdings = Better Results

This might be the most important section of this entire page, so I want to spend a moment on it.

There’s a well-documented phenomenon in investing research that I think of as the “simplicity premium.” It’s not a factor in the academic sense – it’s a behavioral reality. Investors with simpler portfolios earn better real-world returns than investors with complicated ones.

Here’s why:

People trade less

Every time you look at a multi-fund portfolio, you’re comparing performance between your holdings. “Why is this one lagging? Should I sell it and buy more of the winner?” These questions lead to unnecessary trades, which lead to worse outcomes. With one fund, there’s nothing to compare.

People stick with the plan

Vanguard’s research on the “Advisor’s Alpha” found that behavioral coaching – keeping investors from making emotional decisions – adds roughly 1-2% per year in returns. A simple portfolio is its own behavioral coach. When there’s only one thing to hold, “stay the course” is easy to follow.

People actually start investing

Analysis paralysis is real. I’ve heard from countless people who spent months researching the perfect 5-ETF portfolio and never actually opened an account. The person who buys XEQT on day one and invests consistently will almost always outperform the person who waits six months to build the “optimal” portfolio.

If that sounds like you, my guide on overcoming analysis paralysis might be exactly what you need.

People avoid performance chasing

When you own multiple funds, you inevitably notice that one of them is the “best performer” over the past year. The temptation to sell the underperformers and pile into the winner is strong – and it’s almost always wrong. Last year’s winner is frequently next year’s laggard. With one fund, this temptation doesn’t exist.

**The research is clear:** Dalbar's annual Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior consistently shows that the average equity fund investor underperforms the market by 3-4% per year, largely due to poor timing decisions. A one-fund, buy-and-hold approach eliminates the most common behavioral mistakes that cause this gap.

The simplicity premium is real, and it’s large. For most investors, the single best thing you can do for your portfolio is make it boring enough that you stop thinking about it.


How to Actually Implement a One-Fund XEQT Portfolio

Knowing that XEQT is enough is one thing. Actually setting it up is another. Here’s the step-by-step process using Wealthsimple, which is what I personally use and recommend for Canadians buying XEQT.

Step 1: Open a Wealthsimple Account

If you don’t already have one, sign up for Wealthsimple Trade. It’s free, there are no commissions on Canadian ETF trades, and you can hold TFSA, RRSP, FHSA, and non-registered accounts all in one place.

Step 2: Choose Your Account Type

For most people, the priority order is:

  1. TFSA – max this out first (unless your employer matches RRSP contributions)
  2. RRSP – especially valuable if you’re in a higher tax bracket
  3. FHSA – if you’re saving for your first home
  4. Non-registered – after all tax-sheltered room is used

Step 3: Fund Your Account

Transfer money from your bank. Wealthsimple supports one-time transfers and recurring deposits. I recommend setting up a recurring deposit that aligns with your pay schedule.

Step 4: Buy XEQT

Search for “XEQT” in the app, enter the amount you want to invest, and confirm the purchase. That’s it. Your entire portfolio is now globally diversified across 12,000+ stocks.

Step 5: Set Up Recurring Buys

This is the key to making a one-fund portfolio truly hands-off. Wealthsimple lets you set up automatic recurring purchases. Pick your amount, pick your frequency, and let it run.

For the full walkthrough with screenshots, check out my guide on how to automate XEQT purchases on Wealthsimple.

Step 6: Review Quarterly (Not Daily)

Set a calendar reminder to check your portfolio once per quarter. During each review, ask yourself two questions:

  1. Has my time horizon changed?
  2. Has my risk tolerance changed?

If the answer to both is no, change nothing. Close the app and go live your life.

Set Up Your XEQT Portfolio in Minutes

Wealthsimple lets you buy XEQT with zero commissions and automate recurring purchases. Get $25 to start.

Get Your $25 Bonus

My Personal Take: I’m 90%+ XEQT and Here’s Why

I want to be transparent about my own approach, because I think it’s useful context.

My portfolio is over 90% XEQT. I hold it in my TFSA and RRSP, and I buy more every month through automatic recurring purchases on Wealthsimple. I don’t try to time the market. I don’t check my portfolio daily. I’ve set up a system and I let it run.

Why not 100%? I keep a small cash reserve in a HISA ETF for short-term flexibility, and I have a modest allocation to a bond ETF in my RRSP as I start thinking about the longer arc of my investing life. But XEQT is the overwhelming core of everything I do.

Here’s what I’ve learned from this approach:

Am I leaving money on the table by not optimizing my tax strategy across accounts? Maybe a few hundred dollars a year. Am I leaving peace of mind on the table by keeping things complicated? Absolutely not.

For beginners just starting out with XEQT, this is the approach I recommend. Start simple. Build the habit. You can always add complexity later if your situation genuinely calls for it – but most people never need to.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is XEQT really enough for a complete portfolio?

Yes, for most Canadian investors with a long time horizon. XEQT holds 12,000+ stocks across 49 countries, covering every major sector and geography. It’s automatically rebalanced by BlackRock and charges just 0.20% per year. The only thing it doesn’t include is bonds, which long-term investors don’t necessarily need. If you want more detail, read my full breakdown of what is XEQT.

What about bonds? Shouldn’t I own some?

It depends on your time horizon and risk tolerance. If you’re more than 10 years from needing the money, 100% equities (XEQT alone) has historically delivered the best returns. If you’re within 5-10 years of retirement or you know you’d panic-sell during a 30% drop, adding bonds makes sense. I cover this in depth in my XEQT vs bond ETFs comparison and my guide to building a two-ETF portfolio.

Won’t I miss out on returns by not picking individual stocks?

Almost certainly not. The data is overwhelming: over any 15-year period, roughly 85-90% of professional fund managers fail to beat a simple index fund after fees. Individual stock pickers do even worse on average. XEQT gives you the market return, which beats most active strategies over time. The few people who do beat the market consistently are almost impossible to identify in advance.

Should I hold XEQT in my TFSA or RRSP?

Either works well. If you’re choosing one account to start, the TFSA is usually the best first choice for most Canadians because of its flexibility – you can withdraw anytime without tax consequences and you get the contribution room back the following year. For the full comparison, read my guide on XEQT in your TFSA vs RRSP.

How much money do I need to start investing in XEQT?

You can buy fractional shares on Wealthsimple, which means you can start with as little as $1. There’s no minimum portfolio size where XEQT “makes sense.” Whether you’re investing $50 per month or $5,000 per month, the same one-fund strategy applies. Starting early and investing consistently matters far more than starting with a large amount.

What if I already own VEQT, XGRO, or other ETFs? Should I switch to XEQT?

Not necessarily. VEQT is extremely similar to XEQT – they’re both 100% global equity all-in-one ETFs with nearly identical holdings and costs. Switching from VEQT to XEQT would gain you almost nothing. XGRO includes 20% bonds, so it’s a slightly different risk profile. If you’re happy with your current fund and it aligns with your goals, there’s no urgency to switch. The one-fund principle applies to any well-diversified all-in-one ETF, not just XEQT specifically.


The Bottom Line

The investing industry makes money by convincing you that things are complicated. That you need more products, more accounts, more strategies, more optimization. And for a small number of investors with very large portfolios and complex tax situations, some of that complexity is justified.

But for the typical Canadian investor – someone in their 20s, 30s, or 40s, contributing regularly to a TFSA or RRSP, with a decade or more before they need the money – XEQT alone is genuinely all you need.

One fund. One account. Automatic contributions. Quarterly check-ins. That’s the whole plan.

It’s not sexy. It won’t make for exciting conversation at dinner parties. But it works, and the evidence says it works better than almost anything more complicated.

The best portfolio isn’t the one with the most holdings. It’s the one you’ll actually stick with for 20 years. For most people, that’s XEQT.

Ready to Start Your One-Fund Portfolio?

Open a Wealthsimple account, buy XEQT, and set up recurring purchases. Simple, effective, done. Get $25 when you fund your account.

Get Your $25 Bonus