vs
VT costs less, by 0.13% a year
VT holds more companies
25% vs 3% Canadian exposure
XEQT compared with VT
Measure XEQTiShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio VTVanguard Total World Stock ETF
MER What actually comes out of your return each year 0.19% 0.06%
Management fee The manager's cut, before fund operating costs 0.17% 0.06%
Stocks held Individual companies you end up owning 8,253 10,185
Direct holdings What the fund itself holds. Low for a fund of funds 5 10,185
Assets under management Fund size $24.6B CAD $81.8B USD
Distribution yield Trailing 12-month 1.61% <span class="cmp-unknown" title="Not confirmed">&mdash;</span>
1-year total return Past performance, not a forecast <span class="cmp-unknown" title="Not confirmed">&mdash;</span> 16.32%
Equity allocation The rest is bonds or cash 100% 100%
Listed on TSX NYSE Arca
Currency CAD USD
Structure Fund of funds Direct holdings
Launched 2019 2008

Where the money actually goes

XEQT

United States 45%
Canada 25%
International developed 25%
Emerging markets 5%

VT

United States 62%
Canada 3%
International developed 25%
Emerging markets 10%

What the fee difference costs you

Growth projections use a user-adjustable expected return, defaulting to 7%, and are applied net of each fund's MER so the fee drag is visible. They are not forecasts and deliberately do not extrapolate the trailing return: the trailing year shown below was an unusually strong one for global equities and projecting it forward would be misleading.

Data as of XEQT 2026-11-11 (source) , VT 2026-09-30 (source) . MER and fee figures change; the fund's own factsheet is always the authority.

Should Canadians Buy US-Listed Global ETFs?

You found the spreadsheet. VT saves you $650 a year over XEQT. So why haven’t you bought it yet?

Because buying it means a USD account, a currency conversion, Norbert’s Gambit, and a tax exposure your estate might have to file for. I went down that rabbit hole myself — three days of research, a USD account opened, and zero dollars invested. That is the real cost of the cheaper ETF.

I ran the numbers for 25 years. The answer is not what the spreadsheet says.

Quick answer: XEQT vs VT — which is better for Canadians? VT is cheaper on paper — 0.06% MER vs XEQT's 0.19%, about $650 a year on a $500,000 portfolio. But VT is bought in US dollars, and the conversion spread, withholding tax and extra paperwork eat most of that $650. In a TFSA the 25-year gap is just ~$2,000. XEQT is the simpler choice for most Canadians — and the one you will actually buy every month.

At a glance — every figure below is covered in detail further down the page:

  XEQT VT
Listed on TSX (Toronto) NYSE Arca (US)
Currency Canadian dollars US dollars
MER 0.19% 0.06%
Holdings ~8,300 stocks ~10,200 stocks
Fund size ~$24.6B CAD (Nov 2026) ~$101.7B USD (Oct 2026)
Launched Aug 2019 Jun 2008
Distributions Quarterly Quarterly
Canada weight ~25% ~3%
US weight ~45% ~62%
Withholding drag (TFSA) ~0.25% ~0.35%
Withholding drag (RRSP) ~0.25% ~0%
Best for Most Canadians, monthly investing Large RRSPs, lump-sum buys

1. What Each ETF Actually Is

Before we compare, let’s make sure we are on the same page about what these two funds do.

XEQT – iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Detail XEQT
Listed on Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)
Currency Canadian dollars (CAD)
MER 0.19%
Holdings ~8,300 stocks globally
Structure Fund of funds (holds 5 underlying iShares ETFs)
Manager BlackRock (iShares)
Asset allocation ~45% US, ~25% Canada, ~25% International, ~5% Emerging Markets

XEQT is a Canadian-listed, all-in-one equity ETF. You buy it in Canadian dollars on the TSX, and BlackRock handles everything – the global diversification, the rebalancing, the currency exposure. One ticker, done.

VT – Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

Detail VT
Listed on NYSE Arca (US exchange)
Currency US dollars (USD)
MER 0.06%
Holdings ~10,200 stocks globally
Structure Direct holdings (single fund)
Manager Vanguard
Asset allocation ~62% US, ~3% Canada, ~25% International, ~10% Emerging Markets

VT is a US-listed global equity ETF. It holds stocks from around the world in a single fund – but you need US dollars to buy it, and it follows a market-cap weighted global allocation (meaning more US, less Canada than XEQT).


2. The Fee Comparison: It Is Not as Simple as 0.06% vs 0.19%

On the surface, VT wins the fee battle by a mile. The MER is 0.06% compared to XEQT’s 0.19%. That is a 0.13% annual difference, which adds up over time.

But MER is only part of the total cost of owning an ETF as a Canadian. Here is the full picture:

Cost Component XEQT VT
MER 0.19% 0.06%
Currency conversion None (buy in CAD) 1.5% conversion fee or Norbert’s Gambit effort
Foreign withholding tax (TFSA) ~0.25% drag ~0.35% drag
Foreign withholding tax (RRSP) ~0.25% drag ~0% drag (US-Canada treaty)
Trading commissions $0 on Wealthsimple $0 on Wealthsimple (USD account)
Rebalancing cost None (automatic) None (single fund)
Your time and stress Minimal Moderate to high

Currency conversion: The hidden cost nobody talks about

If you buy VT, you need US dollars. There are three ways to get them:

  1. Your broker’s standard conversion – Wealthsimple charges a 1.5% conversion fee on amounts under $10,000 (tiered down to 0% for conversions of $100,000 or more). On a $10,000 purchase, that is $150 gone immediately.

  2. Norbert’s Gambit – You buy a dual-listed stock (like DLR/DLR.U) on the Canadian side, journal it to the US side, and sell it in USD. This cuts conversion costs to near zero, but it takes several business days, requires multiple trades, and some brokers make it unnecessarily complicated.

  3. Wealthsimple USD account – You can add a USD account for $10/month (free once you reach Premium status at $100,000 in assets). Trades made inside the USD account carry no conversion fee, but converting CAD to USD still costs 1.5% on amounts under $10,000. This is the cleanest option for frequent US trading, but that $120/year subscription fee needs to be factored into your cost comparison.

For most investors making regular monthly contributions, the currency conversion friction alone erases the MER advantage of VT.


3. Withholding Tax: Where VT Wins in One Specific Scenario

This is where the comparison gets interesting for investors with large RRSP balances.

How foreign withholding tax works

When US companies pay dividends, the US government withholds 15% in tax before the money leaves the country. Canadian-listed ETFs like XEQT cannot recover this withholding tax in any account type – it is baked into the fund’s returns as a hidden drag of roughly 0.25%.

US-listed ETFs like VT, however, are treated differently in an RRSP. Thanks to the Canada-US tax treaty, US-listed ETFs held in an RRSP are exempt from the 15% US withholding tax. This saves you roughly 0.25-0.35% per year.

Account Type XEQT Withholding Tax Drag VT Withholding Tax Drag
TFSA ~0.25% ~0.35% (no treaty protection)
RRSP ~0.25% ~0% (treaty protected)
Non-registered ~0.25% (some recoverable via tax credit) ~0.15% (some recoverable)

The RRSP advantage

In an RRSP, VT has a genuine cost advantage:

  • VT total cost: 0.06% MER + ~0% withholding = ~0.06%
  • XEQT total cost: 0.19% MER + ~0.25% withholding = ~0.44%

That is a ~0.38% annual difference. On a $500,000 RRSP, that is roughly $1,900 per year. Over 20 years with compounding, the difference becomes meaningful.

The TFSA disadvantage

In a TFSA, VT actually has worse withholding tax treatment because the Canada-US treaty does not protect TFSAs. VT’s US dividends get hit with the full 15% withholding, while XEQT’s structure provides a small buffer.


4. Geographic Allocation: More US or More Canada?

XEQT and VT slice up the world differently:

Region XEQT VT
United States ~45% ~62%
Canada ~25% ~3%
International Developed ~24% ~25%
Emerging Markets ~5% ~10%

The big difference is the home country bias. XEQT deliberately overweights Canada at ~25%, while VT gives Canada its market-cap weight of roughly 3%.

Arguments for XEQT’s Canadian overweight:

  • Canadian dividends get preferential tax treatment in non-registered accounts
  • No currency risk on the Canadian portion
  • Your expenses are in Canadian dollars, so Canadian stocks provide a natural hedge
  • Canadian banks and resource companies provide good diversification to US tech

Arguments for VT’s market-cap weight:

  • More “pure” global diversification
  • Less dependence on Canada’s resource-heavy, bank-heavy economy
  • Higher US allocation captures more of the world’s innovation engine

Personally, I think XEQT’s Canadian overweight makes sense for most Canadians. We live here, we spend Canadian dollars, and our tax system rewards Canadian dividends. But reasonable people can disagree on this.


5. The Convenience Factor: This Is Where XEQT Pulls Away

Let me be blunt: for 95% of Canadian investors, XEQT is dramatically more convenient than VT.

Here is what buying XEQT looks like:

  1. Open Wealthsimple account
  2. Set up automatic deposits
  3. Buy XEQT
  4. Repeat forever

Here is what buying VT looks like:

  1. Open Wealthsimple account (or another broker with USD trading)
  2. Fund your CAD account
  3. Convert CAD to USD (either pay the spread or do Norbert’s Gambit)
  4. Wait for settlement
  5. Buy VT in your USD account
  6. Track your adjusted cost base in CAD for tax purposes
  7. Deal with US estate tax exposure if your US holdings exceed $60,000 USD
  8. File additional tax forms if required

The VT route adds friction at every step. And in investing, friction kills returns – not because of the direct costs, but because friction causes procrastination. Every month you delay investing because the currency conversion is annoying is a month of lost compounding.

Start Investing in XEQT in 5 Minutes

Skip the currency conversion headaches. Open a free Wealthsimple account and get $25 towards your first XEQT purchase.

Get Your $25 Bonus

6. Fractional Shares and Auto-Invest

XEQT has another practical advantage on Wealthsimple: fractional shares and automatic investing.

With XEQT, you can:

  • Set up recurring weekly or biweekly purchases that match your payday
  • Invest any dollar amount (even $10) thanks to fractional shares
  • Never think about it again – true set-and-forget

With VT on Wealthsimple, you can also buy fractional shares in the USD account, but you still need to handle the currency conversion step. On other brokerages like Questrade, fractional shares for US-listed ETFs may not be available at all.

The auto-invest feature alone is worth the MER difference for most people. Automating your investments removes the single biggest risk to your long-term returns: yourself.


7. US Estate Tax: The Risk Nobody Mentions

Here is a genuinely scary one that most VT advocates gloss over.

If you are a Canadian resident holding more than $60,000 USD in US-listed securities (including VT) and you pass away, your estate may be subject to US estate tax at rates up to 40%. The Canada-US tax treaty provides some relief, but the rules are complex and may require your estate to file a US tax return.

XEQT, as a Canadian-listed ETF, is not subject to US estate tax regardless of how much you hold. This is a meaningful advantage for investors with large portfolios.

If your VT holdings grow to $200,000+ USD, this is not a theoretical risk – it is something your estate would need to deal with.


8. When VT Actually Makes Sense

I have been pretty pro-XEQT so far, so let me be fair. There are scenarios where VT is the better choice:

VT might be right for you if:

  • You have a large RRSP ($200,000+) where the withholding tax savings are significant
  • You already have a Wealthsimple Premium status or a brokerage that offers cheap USD conversion
  • You are comfortable with Norbert’s Gambit and do not mind the extra steps
  • You prefer VT’s market-cap weighted global allocation with less Canadian home bias
  • You are making infrequent large purchases (lump sums) rather than small monthly contributions, which minimizes the currency conversion hassle
  • You understand and are prepared for the US estate tax implications

The ideal VT investor is someone with a $300,000+ RRSP who makes quarterly lump-sum purchases, uses Norbert’s Gambit efficiently, and does not mind a bit of extra administrative work in exchange for lower costs.


9. When XEQT Is the Clear Winner

XEQT is better for you if:

  • You invest monthly or biweekly in smaller amounts
  • You use a TFSA as your primary investment account
  • You want to automate your investments and never think about currency conversion
  • You prefer simplicity and want a single CAD-denominated holding
  • You do not want to worry about US estate tax exposure
  • You value Canadian home bias for tax and currency reasons
  • You are a beginner or intermediate investor who wants to keep things simple
  • Your portfolio is under $200,000 where the fee savings are minimal in dollar terms

For most Canadians – especially those early in their investing journey – XEQT is the obvious choice. The small MER premium buys you enormous convenience, simplicity, and peace of mind.

The Simple Path to Global Investing

One ETF, 8,000+ stocks, zero currency headaches. Get $25 when you open a free Wealthsimple account.

Get Your $25 Bonus

10. Let’s Do the Math: How Much Does the Difference Actually Cost?

Let’s put real numbers on this. Assume you invest $500 per month for 25 years with an average annual return of 8% before fees.

Scenario Annual Cost Drag Final Portfolio Difference vs XEQT
XEQT (TFSA) ~0.44% total ~$438,000 –
VT (TFSA) ~0.41% total ~$440,000 +$2,000
XEQT (RRSP) ~0.44% total ~$438,000 –
VT (RRSP) ~0.06% total ~$462,000 +$24,000

In a TFSA, the difference is negligible – roughly $2,000 over 25 years, easily wiped out by a single currency conversion mistake or a month of delayed investing.

In an RRSP, the difference is more meaningful at ~$24,000 over 25 years. But this assumes you execute the currency conversion flawlessly every time, never procrastinate, and are comfortable with the added complexity.

The question is: is that $24,000 over 25 years worth the ongoing hassle? For some people, absolutely yes. For most people, probably not.


11. My Recommendation

Here is my honest take after years of thinking about this:

Start with XEQT. For most Canadians, stop there.

If your portfolio grows past $200,000-$300,000 and most of it is in an RRSP, then it might make sense to explore VT for the RRSP portion specifically. By that point, you will have enough investing experience to handle the currency conversion and tax complexity with confidence.

But do not let the VT optimization rabbit hole delay your investing by even a single month. The difference between XEQT and VT is measured in fractions of a percent. The difference between investing today and investing “once I figure out the optimal setup” is measured in years of lost compounding.

The best global ETF is the one you actually buy consistently. For most Canadians, that is XEQT.

Still Researching? Your Future Self Is Waiting

Every month you spend comparing ETFs is a month your money is not compounding. Open a free Wealthsimple account, buy XEQT in five minutes, and get $25 to start.

Get Your $25 Bonus

Some articles were generated using artificial intelligence. While we strive for accuracy, AI can occasionally produce errors or outdated information. Please independently verify critical details.